ABO incompatibility may reduce virus transmissibility by 60% or more

Share Button

Several independent datasets suggest blood type A is over-represented and type O under24 represented among COVID-19 patients. Here, I model a scenario in which ABO transfusion incompatibility reduces the chance of a patient transmitting the virus to an incompatible recipient. Comparison of model outputs to published data on COVID-19 prevalence indicates that if this scenario holds true, ABO incompatibility may reduce virus transmissibility by 60% or more. Paradoxically, however, targeted vaccination of either high-susceptibility type A or “super spreader” type O individuals is less effective than random vaccination at blocking community spread of the virus. Instead, the key is to maintain blood type diversity amongst the remaining susceptible individuals. I stress that these results illustrate a theoretical model of ABO blood group interaction with virus transmission and require confirmation by observation.

Access the PDF file:

Modelling suggests blood group incompatibility may substantially reduce SARS-CoV-2 transmission

Several recent published studies and preprints have suggested that the prevalence of COVID39 19 disease varies by blood type, with type A being relatively susceptible and type O being less susceptible. Puzzlingly, however, there is no difference in the severity of disease, with the case fatality ratio (CFR) and the probability of progressing to intensive care appearing independent of blood type. This discrepancy between incidence and severity data has led some authors to challenge the aforementioned findings. Although not remarked on to date, in the majority of these studies type AB appears even more susceptible than type A. Thus, the relative risk of infection is AB > A > B > O, with type A and type B alleles functioning codominantly to increase risk. This is immediately reminiscent of the rules governing blood transfusion compatibility.

Share Button

52 Comments

  1. Robin November 14, 2020
  2. Ken November 16, 2020
  3. Ken November 16, 2020
      • Ken November 17, 2020
        • Robin December 5, 2020
          • Ken December 5, 2020
      • Robin November 22, 2020
    • Robin December 9, 2020
  4. Ken November 17, 2020
    • Robin December 5, 2020
      • Ken December 5, 2020
        • Robin December 5, 2020
          • Ken December 5, 2020
  5. Ken November 18, 2020
    • Robin November 20, 2020
  6. Ken November 20, 2020
    • Robin November 22, 2020
    • Ken December 9, 2020
      • Robin December 9, 2020
      • Robin December 10, 2020
      • Ken December 11, 2020
    • Robin December 9, 2020
  7. Ken November 21, 2020
    • Robin November 22, 2020
    • Lashleigh November 24, 2020
      • Ken November 25, 2020
  8. Robin November 22, 2020
  9. Robin November 22, 2020
  10. Robin November 22, 2020
  11. Ken November 22, 2020
    • Robin November 23, 2020
  12. Robin November 26, 2020
  13. Ken November 28, 2020
  14. Lashleigh November 29, 2020
  15. Ken December 2, 2020
  16. Robin December 5, 2020
    • Ken December 5, 2020
    • Ken December 6, 2020
    • Ken December 8, 2020
      • Mike DammannAuthor December 8, 2020
        • Robin December 9, 2020
          • Mike DammannAuthor January 29, 2021
        • Robin December 9, 2020
  17. Ken December 8, 2020
  18. zaina January 12, 2021
    • Ken January 13, 2021
      • Robin January 14, 2021
        • Ken January 14, 2021
          • Robin January 15, 2021

Add a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.