Are vaccines harmful or not?

I have come to believe that the general population enjoys division. Be it based on race, religion, sexual orientation or any type of belief system. This includes far too many rhesus negatives as well. You will likely see some doctors warn about vaccinations while others swear up and down that no harm can be done through them. Until 2002, Thimerosal was included in the Anti-D shot. I have met a few rhesus negatives with mental disabilities who have mothers who are rhesus negative. The mothers have told me that they received the Anti-D shot and regret it because they didn’t need it. Thimerosal (contains Aluminum) has been removed from the Anti-D shots, but is still present in vaccinations children receive. So now we have two different camps:
a) “Vaccines have terrible side-effects and are dangerous”.
b) “Vaccines are completely harmless”.
The answer:
One doesn’t have to exclude the other.
It is entirely possible that despite Thimerosal, most children are unharmed while some, more sensitive than most, are being harmed by them. Many may believe that this is ok as collateral damage, a small price to pay for the greater good. But is it when you are the parent of the child?
I believe in vaccinations being voluntary and up to the parents to decide. Several studies have shown rhesus negatives to rank worse for overall health, and I have concluded that this is not due to internal ailment, but rather external influences we react more strongly towards. Several studies have shown life-expectancies differing based on blood types and in some parts of the world, certain blood types appear to do better while in other parts of the world different blood types. It appears to me that in some parts of the world, conditions are a lot worse for rhesus negatives than for others.

In other words: We are not born to be sick. We are not born to have shorter lives. We simply are living in a society where decisions are made for us which contribute to us not doing well.

Be careful when someone tries to convince you of anything. If your children are ok despite being vaccinated, more power to them. But it doesn’t give us the right to ignore risk factors because we are the lucky ones. Not all parents are responsible people. Many do not really care to research anything on their own. But as far as I stand, I support the right of everyone who actually bothers to research independently and concludes that vaccinating a child would be too risky (be it or be it not the case), should have the right to refuse it for the child. In addition: You may be told Thimerosal is needed in vaccines, just like we were told once it was needed in the Anti-D shot. Guess what: It isn’t. But it takes unity among us to pressure the medical industry into doing the right thing. And if we cannot come together to do what is best for the next generations of rhesus negative people, none of us has the right to complain when we suffer on an individual basis and others are not showing concern, simply because “it isn’t them”.

– Mike Dammann

See also:

Studies indicate higher risk of autism amongst children of rh negative mothers