I will try my best to do better from now on:
What is the origin of Rh negative blood?
The origin goes back. Way back… maybe very far and maybe not that far. It is really a matter of which version you personally prefer and after placing both into perspective, deleting all confirmation bias within you and allowing yourself to see what your intuition is actually telling you.
I challenge ALL beliefs. It doesn’t matter every belief is wrong. Even beliefs born out of ignorance may actually get you towards somewhere… if you allow intuition to rule rather than words of others.
We are talking Rh negative blood in humans and humanoids for those of you not considering the 3 percent Neanderthal DNA within yourself human.
We are not talking greyhounds, apes etc. We are talking Rh negative blood that can be donated to you without you passing away. Let’s make and keep this clear once and for all.
Scientific researchers are getting things wrong more than you can probably imagine as their livelihood depends on deadlines and giving opinions they haven’t formed yet. There are also seductions of creating headlines and the need to give possible reasons for phenomena discovered without having examined and been able to get to such yet. In other words: The discussion section in medical and scientific publications is there for a reason, but not always a good one. The reason for the existence is in large part due to convincing editors who feel threatened by anything they cannot explain, so to keep them from rejecting something groundbreaking is to give them theories that get them to be able to pick the one they most like.
“Scientists say” is the dumbest line and whenever an article starts with that… do not base future thoughts on such article.
“Who are those scientists” said with Seinfeld’s voice “and why are they speaking for all science?”
I have read more nonsense in scientific magazines than in the few times I watched CNN.
Of course, I don’t watch CNN that much, but scientific publications are really not that much better.
Always look for the studies they reference, even if you have no time to read it all and even if there is terminology you are unfamiliar with. Oftentimes, purposely using language unknown to most keeps authors from being challenged. It is often cowardly as disconnecting the average person doesn’t allow contributions that could hold a significant key.
Of course, it is up to you to use Google to look up all terminology and if you are passionate about something, you probably have done so often.
So back to the original question:
It is easy to replace the lack of knowledge with a belief and whenever you express confusion, there are plenty of “believers” waiting for you to give up on your own mind and join them in their beliefs and hopes.
“We lack the monkey gene, so we must come from aliens”.
Ego. Anger. Hatred. All of that can come together and get you to buy into such nonsense.
“How do you know?” is the usual reply I get. I don’t. But I search. I REsearch. I keep revisiting all of the information I have and little by little I get closer to the real answers. I also don’t like confirmation bias. I like to be proven wrong. It can be a hard hit where you decide to hide from the world for 3 days, but when you return, you do so 10 times wiser.
My question is rather “where does Rh positive blood come from?” as all that had to happen was the the Rh antigen to be deleted, not the lack of such to be imported.
Just because a leading scientist estimates that RH negative blood came about in Africa 600,000 years ago doesn’t make it so. Just because A.E. Mourant’s study is old doesn’t mean his estimation of 50,000 years needs to be dismissed:
Having found out that the Neanderthals examined were Partial-D could have made them the stepping stones between Rh positive and Rh negative blood indeed.
I made one mistake before: The person teaching me about Neanderthals also spread disinformation, so I dismissed a lot of what was really in-my-face-mindblowing-reality.
Don’t put too much emphasis on credibility. Wrong-minded people can also give you groundbreaking information and well-minded people can completely screw you over and then you realize their intentions may have been otherwise.
English
Afrikaans
Albanian
Amharic
Arabic
Armenian
Azerbaijani
Basque
Belarusian
Bengali
Bosnian
Bulgarian
Catalan
Cebuano
Chichewa
Chinese (Simplified)
Chinese (Traditional)
Corsican
Croatian
Czech
Danish
Dutch
Esperanto
Estonian
Filipino
Finnish
French
Frisian
Galician
Georgian
German
Greek
Gujarati
Haitian Creole
Hausa
Hawaiian
Hebrew
Hindi
Hmong
Hungarian
Icelandic
Igbo
Indonesian
Irish
Italian
Japanese
Javanese
Kannada
Kazakh
Khmer
Korean
Kurdish (Kurmanji)
Kyrgyz
Lao
Latin
Latvian
Lithuanian
Luxembourgish
Macedonian
Malagasy
Malay
Malayalam
Maltese
Maori
Marathi
Mongolian
Myanmar (Burmese)
Nepali
Norwegian
Pashto
Persian
Polish
Portuguese
Punjabi
Romanian
Russian
Samoan
Scottish Gaelic
Serbian
Sesotho
Shona
Sindhi
Sinhala
Slovak
Slovenian
Somali
Spanish
Sudanese
Swahili
Swedish
Tajik
Tamil
Telugu
Thai
Turkish
Ukrainian
Urdu
Uzbek
Vietnamese
Welsh
Xhosa
Yiddish
Yoruba
Zulu
Hi,
I learned I am O-neg many years ago after getting pregnant. My best friend was also O-neg. Her mother as well. Her mother learned of a study on Rh negs that was conducted at UCLA around ‘92. UCLA decided not to release the findings due to the social implications. They found Rh negs to be more scholarly, less likely to be incarcerated and overall more evolved. I have tried to find the study results over the years but found nothing. I also heard that after testing the Shroud of Turin that Jesus supposedly had AB neg blood. I try to stay up on the latest findings as I’m somewhat of an anomaly in my family. My O-neg blood is recessed. Neither of my parents have it. My Dad is O positive and descended from Swedish/French Royalty. I’m the only O-neg and left-handed out of 5 kids. I have few friends but definitely attract other Rh-negs.
I really enjoy reading your posts. Thank you.
-Bridget
I specifically got into this blog to find out the origins of RH negative since I am A– and surrounded by friends and relatives who are RH negative and I have a number of physical characteristics NOT found in RH positive people. Just last week I saw an article that said Neanderthals were not ever RH negative and my DNA analysis shows I have an above average amount of Neanderthal DNA. My mothers haplogroup has been classified as rare. Its frustrating to read stuff that doesn’t lead to the source of RH negative blood type. That was one of the reasons why I had an analysis done and then come to find out the company I used has no interest in RH negative blood typing. Tip that off with I was raised being told some of my relatives came from Guernsey Island and that my RH negative origins were most likely Basque. The DNA analysis shows neither Guernsey or Basque DNA. I was also told I was mostly German which did turn out to be true but I don’t trust the DNA analysis because so many people who I supposedly share DNA with have been mislabeled in my family tree and I have had to correct those relationships myself, NOT the DNA company. Except for the fact I nearly bled to death internally, twice, and had to have massive blood transfusions of the correct A– blood, I feel like I’ve been sucked into a never ending rabbit hole. If you name a physical or mental RH negative characteristic, I have it but all the experts and scientist in the world don’t seem to have a clue.
“Where does Rh negative come from?”
The ORIGIN is in any place of WESTERN EUROPE, in the nations in the Atlantic region.
However, their ancient STRONGHOLD and source of DIFFUSION seems to be ENGLAND(and maybe Ireland), since that’s the place between Scottland and Euskadi (Basque Country), aka the 2 Rh- hotspots.
I say England because a flatland may seem better to form a civilization than the mountains but… There’s also the possibility humanity comes from hilly places, since the origins of humanity point to secluded populations suddenly conquering others. Caucasians becoming Mesopotamians and Scottish and Basque Rh- are 2 examples.
Someone could say that France is also between those 2 places, and that’s true, but remember that France was occupied by 100% ENF DNA since 7500 years ago. And Anatolia Neolithic ancestry (Mediterranean sea) doesn’t correlate with Rh-.
France has the best geography compared to Spain and British Isles, so maybe is the place where Rh- arose, but, today’s distribution seems to radiate from somewhere else.
The British Isles and the mountain range of N. Spain on the other hand, were only settled by “neolithics” once W”HG” men absorbed and admixed this European neolithic ethnic group.
And surprise, surprise… Those are the places where Rh- is most common.
If you’re wondering why I use ” is because I don’t believe that White Westeners were as unadvanced as the words Mesolithic and Hunter Gatherer make them look like.
Another possibility is that people like the Jews or other creators of civilizations from ‘the Middle East’ are part of the rise of Rh-. Also the Swedes(Scandinavians) and played an important role in the rise of European civilizations.